Typetrigger is excited to be involved with this year's Seattle Reads, which is a program of the Washington Center for the Book at the Seattle Public Library. From the reading guide for this year's program:
[Seattle Reads is] a project designed to deepen engatement in literature through reading and discussion. Each year the Library hosts an author for a series of free programs...We also host a series of programs, film screenings, readings, and other events around the themes of the featured work.
Our plan is to engage Typetrigger members in a conversation around this year's book, Little Bee, by Chris Cleave. We invite all members to read this book, and in coming weeks we will post triggers that tie in with the text, giving our writers a chance to respond to the events and themes in this novel.
Little Bee is an intensely emotional tale of a young Nigerian woman, Little Bee, who is seeking asylum in London. Her connection to a white magazine editor, Sarah, is revealed as the story unfolds, each woman narrating a chapter at a time. The pace and intense subject matter bring the reader through a wide range of questions and feelings in quick succession. Whether you are gripped by Cleave's use of language or by the complex issues of refugees, Little Bee provokes.
Chris Higashi, the program manager of Washington Center for the Book, who started Seattle Reads with librarian Nancy Pearl, took some time to talk to us about how the program.
Q&A with Chris Higashi
In your experience, what makes a good book for reading in a group?
Good books for discussion tend to share certain characteristics: they explore basic human truths
and raise universal themes that readers can identify with; have three-dimensional characters
forced to make difficult choices in difficult circumstances, whose decisions don’t always make
sense to everyone. Ambiguous endings drive some readers crazy, but they’re great for book
discussion.
How is a city-wide reading program like Seattle Reads different from an individual book club?
An individual book club might have special interests and with the group’s members in mind,
focus on certain genres, authors, countries or cultures, make any number of choices specific to
them. A book for a city-wide program needs all the characteristics of a good book for discussion
and more: a book with sufficiently broad appeal to be read by a wide variety of readers; one
that’s relevant to the community (what works well here won’t necessarily be a good choice
someplace else); that raises many, many questions, enough to sustain a discussion.
Equally important for us – because hosting the author, putting the author before audiences
in settings, large and small – is an author who is willing to, likes to, engage with readers – is
comfortable talking with them, not just at them. Not everyone is comfortable interacting with the
public. Seattle Reads is a chance for readers and writer to talk with one another. You’ve mulled
questions about the book in your book group or as an individual reader, you wonder about a
character’s action, you want to know why the author made that choice. People come to events
having read the book carefully, thought about the issues raised, and wanting answers to hard
questions.
If the book chosen is not the author’s latest, is the author willing to go back and focus on an
earlier work? Not everyone with a new or recent book will want to divert attention and spend
time and energy talking with readers about something else.
How do you choose the book?
This is one of the most frequently asked questions: how does Seattle choose its title? My answer
is, it’s an organic process. I read all the time with Seattle Reads in mind. Independent bookstore
friends who are longtime partners to our project, the Library’s Reader Services librarians who
likewise are intimately familiar with Seattle Reads, and I share ideas, read, comment, reject
scores of books. I do research, talk to booksellers and programming colleagues to learn whatever
I can about the author. We make a recommendation to Library leadership, who typically bless
our selection.
To illustrate, let me describe how we came to our 2008 selection, The Beautiful Things That
Heaven Bears, by Dinaw Mengestu. In spring 2007, Mengestu did a reading at Elliott Bay Book
Co. Rick Simonson and Karen Maeda Allman (knowledgeable about Seattle Reads and also
aware of our Library’s initiative to serve Seattle’s immigrant and refugee community, including
East Africans) called to tell me about Dinaw. They had had a good crowd of 100, this for a debut
novel. He was charming, wonderful with the crowd and Q&A. They sent me an advance copy. I
read it and, oh wow. I gave it to the Fiction Department manager. She, too, loved it.
Meanwhile a library staffer sent me an email, saying “I think you should consider these two
authors for library programs,” and pointed me to two NPR interviews, one of which was with
Dinaw. Then two weeks later, a librarian told me she had read a review, bought the book, read
it over the weekend, and “I think you should consider this for Seattle Reads.” Yes, it was The
Beautiful Things That Heaven Bears.
I said, “Okay, the universe is telling me something.” If we had had a formal process, where a
committee meets, nominates titles, and votes, that would not have happened.
Little Bee is very provocative in part because the author is surprisingly unlike the characters that he so vividly creates. When you select books, do you feel like the author or the story is more important?
One is not more important than the other. I have long felt that even with a great book for
discussion Seattle Reads would fail without a friendly, charismatic, non-egotistical author. Over
the project’s 13 years, I’ve listened to authors answer the same question repeatedly, thoughtfully, with the same enthusiasm as if asked for the first time. Audiences sense and respond in kind to an author’s respect and gratitude for his or her readers.
What is gained by the community when a city reads together?
Seattle Reads and other One Book programs build community. They bring people together. They
foster deep conversation, among strangers as well as friends and family. I firmly believe there’s
no substitute for the face-to-face encounter. People are hungry to connect with one another, to
talk about things that matter to them. Meeting and discussing ideas in the context of a book is a
wonderful way to make those connections happen. Reading is richer when shared. We may all
read the same book, but we each read a different book – because we bring our personal histories
to the reading – and a reader’s appreciation for a book is often enhanced through a facilitated
discussion.
One Book programs expand community. When we feature books by authors of diverse cultures
and ethnicities, we work with community leaders – those tied to new groups we’re trying to
reach. We introduce readers to new worlds. We bridge cultures, and often generations. People
crave stories and conversations that help us make sense of diverse people, places, and events.